Sl. No
|
Planning Commission
|
Niti Ayog
|
1 |
was working as an institution for
developing
and implementing Five year Plans
|
Will work as a think tank |
2
|
Prime Minister was the Chairman
|
Prime Minister is the Chairman. But bigger role for
Prime Minister
|
3
|
Vice Chairman was heading the institution
|
Vice Chairman along with a CEO will run the Institution
|
4
|
there was a Member secretary
|
Now only CEO
|
5
|
Followed Russian Model development (Stalin model)
|
Now follow Chinese model of National development Reform Commission
|
6
|
there were eight full time members
|
Now there are only two full time members
|
7
|
There were 7 Ministers as members of
the
Commission
|
Now 4 Cabinet Ministers and 3 ministers
are invitees |
8
|
Followed Centralised planning
|
Will follow Co-operative federalism |
9
|
had very limited role for state governments
|
Now it will provide a bigger role for State governments. Regional Council consists of Chief
Ministers and Lieutenant Governors
|
10
|
Development Council had approved Plans
|
Regional Council will discuss the Plan
|
11
|
Many a times had overruled State’s and
Department’s
Plans
|
Priority will be given for State preferences/demands
|
12
|
Had the power to sanction grants/funds
|
Now thee is only advisory power or role
|
13
|
Earlier plans were forced upon the States
|
Now there will be mutually agreed plans |
14
|
Undue importance was given for five year plans
|
Now there is rethinking on Five Year Plans |
Saturday, January 24, 2015
Differences Between Planning Commission and NITI AYOG
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment